Modelling the effects of pasture renewal on the carbon balance of grazed pastures

Lìyǐn L Liáng; Miko U F Kirschbaum; Donna L Giltrap; Aaron M Wall; David I Campbell

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136917

Modelling the effects of pasture renewal on the carbon balance of grazed pastures

Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 1:715:136917. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136917. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

Authors

Lìyǐn L Liáng¹, Miko U F Kirschbaum², Donna L Giltrap², Aaron M Wall³, David I Campbell³

Affiliations

¹ Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. Electronic address: liangl@landcareresearch.co.nz.
² Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Private Bag 11052, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
³ School of Science and Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.

PMID: 32041047
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136917

Abstract

In New Zealand, pasture renewal is a routine management method for maintaining pasture productivity. However, knowledge of the renewal effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks is still limited. Here we use a process-based model, CenW, to comprehensively assess the effects of pasture renewal on the carbon balance of a temperate pasture in the Waikato region of New Zealand. We investigated the effects of renewal frequency, length of fallow period, renewal timing, and the importance and quantification of age-related reductions in productivity. Our results suggest that SOC change depends on the combined effects of renewal on gross primary productivity (GPP), autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, carbon removal by grazing and carbon allocation to roots. Pasture renewal reduces grazing removal proportionately more than GPP because newly established plants need to allocate more carbon to re-build their root system following renewal which limits foliage production. That lengthens the time before above-ground biomass has grown sufficiently to be grazed again. New plants have a lower ratio of autotrophic respiration to GPP, however, which partly compensates for the GPP loss during renewal. Our simulations suggested an average SOC loss of 0.16 tC ha^-1 yr^-1 if pastures were renewed every 25 years, but could gain an average of 0.3 tC ha^-1 yr^-1 if pastures were renewed every year. For maximizing pasture production, the optimal renewal frequency depends on the rate of pasture deterioration with more rapid deterioration rates favouring more frequent renewal. Additionally, the length of the fallow period, renewal timing, and associated environmental conditions are important factors that can affect SOC temporally, but the importance of those effects diminishes at the annual or longer time scales. A major uncertainty for a full understanding of the renewal effect on SOC lies in the rate of pasture deterioration with time since previous renewal.

Keywords: CenW; Eddy covariance; Grazing; NPP; Pasture renewal; Soil carbon.