Securing Mesh with Delayed Absorbable Suture Does Not Increase Risk of Prolapse Recurrence After Robotic Sacral Colpopexy

J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):944-949. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0029. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Nonabsorbable monofilament suture is traditionally used to secure vaginal mesh for robot-assisted sacral colpopexy (RASC) but can become exposed postoperatively requiring invasive vaginal removal. Polydioxanone delayed absorbable suture may avoid this. We sought to determine the objective and subjective impact of suture choice for mesh fixation. Materials and Methods: A cohort study was undertaken using a prospective registry and subjects were grouped based on type of suture at the time of RASC. Apical failure was defined as C point descent of >2 cm, anterior compartment failure was defined as pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) Ba point of >0, and posterior compartment failure was defined as Bp point of >0. Patient-reported outcomes included urogenital distress inventory (UDI)-6 and QoL. Two-tailed t-test and chi-squared were used for analysis. Results: A total of 119 women underwent RASC between 2009 and 2016. Patients had similar preoperative characteristics (Table 1). All POP-Q, UDI-6, and quality of life (QoL) scores improved postoperatively (Tables 1 and 2). Apical failure was noted in 0, anterior failure was noted in 7 (average Ba +1.1 cm in failures), and posterior failure was noted in 4 (mean Bp +1.0 cm) at 16 months' follow-up. Failures in the anterior compartment were much more common in the nonabsorbable monofilament cohort (Table 2). Failures in the apical and posterior compartments were not significantly different between groups. Nine suture erosions were noted in the nonabsorbable monofilament cohort, five requiring excision in the clinic and two in the operating room. Two suture erosions were noted in the delayed absorbable cohort, 0 required excision. Postoperative UDI-6 and QoL scores did not vary significantly between groups (5.3 ± 4.0 vs 5.1 ± 4.0, p = not significant (NS), 2.8 ± 2.0 vs 2.8 ± 2.2, p = NS). [Table: see text] [Table: see text] Conclusion: Securing mesh with delayed absorbable monofilament did not appear to increase risk of failure in patients undergoing RASC and eliminates the need for suture excision postoperatively.

Keywords: cystocele; mesh complication; robotic surgery; sacral colpopexy; vaginal mesh; vaginal prolapse.

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse* / surgery
  • Quality of Life
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Robotics*
  • Surgical Mesh / adverse effects
  • Sutures / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome