Successful home respiratory polygraphy to investigate sleep-disordered breathing in children

Abstract

Objective: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children is common. Interest in sleep tests, such as polygraphy (PG), which can be performed in a non-attended setting, are gaining is increasing. PG has, however, been little studied in children with co-morbidities other than obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and in particular, if performed in a non-attended setting. We report on the feasibility and interpretability of implementing PGs at home versus in hospital.

Methods: PGs were analyzed according to the setting (hospital or home) and sequence (initial or subsequent) in which they were performed. Non-interpretability was defined as absent or unreliable oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO₂), or airflow and respiratory inductance plethysmography flow trace signals during the time analyzed.

Results: We retrospectively analyzed 400 PGs; 332/400 were initial PGs. Indications were: suspected OSA (65%), obesity (13%), craniofacial malformations (5%), neuromuscular disease (4%), and other (13%) which included prematurity. 16% were recorded in hospitals and 84% at home. The mean age was 5.7 ± 5.8 years and 7.3 ± 4.5 years for the hospital and home groups, respectively. Interpretability was similar in both settings (87%). In the 68 subsequent PGs, interpretability was 84% when performed for follow-up and 96% when repeated for non-interpretability. Non-interpretability was predominantly due to a failure of the SpO₂ channel.

Conclusions: PG performed at home is both feasible and interpretable for a variety of indications. Non-interpretability was not predictable in association with the setting, anthropometric data, or indication, independently of the sequence (initial or subsequent PG) in which the parameters were analyzed.

Keywords: Feasibility; Home sleep apnea testing; Non-interpretability; Polygraphy; Sleep-disordered breathing.