On the usefulness of parental lines GWAS for predicting low heritability traits in tropical maize hybrids

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 7;15(2):e0228724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228724. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is one of the most popular methods of studying the genetic control of traits. This methodology has been intensely performed on inbred genotypes to identify causal variants. Nonetheless, the lack of covariance between the phenotype of inbred lines and their offspring in cross-pollinated species (such as maize) raises questions on the applicability of these findings in a hybrid breeding context. To address this topic, we incorporated previously reported parental lines GWAS information into the prediction of a low heritability trait in hybrids. This was done by marker-assisted selection based on significant markers identified in the lines and by genomic prediction having these markers as fixed effects. Additive-dominance GWAS of hybrids, a non-conventional procedure, was also performed for comparison purposes. Our results suggest that incorporating information from parental inbred lines GWAS led to decreases in the predictive ability of hybrids. Correspondingly, inbred lines and hybrids-based GWAS yielded different results. These findings do not invalidate GWAS on inbred lines for selection purposes, but mean that it may not be directly useful for hybrid breeding.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cluster Analysis
  • Genome, Plant
  • Genome-Wide Association Study*
  • Linkage Disequilibrium
  • Phenotype
  • Plant Breeding
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Quantitative Trait, Heritable*
  • Zea mays / genetics*

Grants and funding

This study was financed by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP). Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/25549-6, 2017/24327-0, and 2013/24135-2 Dr. Roberto Fritsche-Neto. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.