A 3-year longitudinal prospective study assessing microbial profile and clinical outcomes of single-unit cement-retained implant restorations: Zirconia versus titanium abutments

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):301-310. doi: 10.1111/cid.12888. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the microbiological and clinical outcomes of implant-supported restorations on zirconia or titanium abutments after 3 years in function.

Materials and methods: Twenty two-part dental implants were placed in 20 healthy individuals in need of single-tooth replacement. Ceramic-based reconstructions were cemented in either zirconia or titanium abutments. Clinical, radiographic, and microbiological outcomes were examined at implant loading and then yearly up to 3 years post-loading.

Results: Cumulative survival/success implant rates were 95% after 3 years. Mean total marginal bone loss was 0.76 ± 0.21 mm for zirconia and 0.99 ± 0.41 mm for titanium, with no significant differences (P > .05). Overall, titanium and zirconia abutments presented similar values of probing depth, gingival recession, and bleeding on probing over time (P < .05). Microbial profile of implants restored with titanium or zirconia is quite similar to that found in the remaining teeth.

Conclusions: Zirconia and titanium presented different microbial profile and genome counts. Clinical findings for both zirconia and titanium abutments were similar and consistent with a healthy condition, reflecting a high survival rate and low bone loss. Microbiota did not impact the clinical outcomes after 3 years of function.

Keywords: bacterial adhesion; checkerbord DNA-DNA hybridization; implant; titanium; zirconia.

MeSH terms

  • Crowns
  • Dental Abutments
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Implants, Single-Tooth*
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies
  • Titanium
  • Zirconium

Substances

  • Dental Implants
  • Zirconium
  • Titanium
  • zirconium oxide