The 'high speed' rotavator is used for shallow tillage to create a fine tilth and incorporate crop residues, often with a single tractor pass. Rotavator tillage has spread quickly in many parts of South Asia, despite short-term experimental trials suggesting deteriorating soil quality and crop yield penalties. Evidence of rotavator impacts on farmer fields across soil gradients and time is largely absent. From a farm household survey conducted among wheat farmers in Nepal, we estimate wheat yield and profitability outcomes for rotavator adopters and non-adopters using propensity score matching. We find that rotavator adoption leads to inferior outcomes, despite significant cost savings for land preparation (US$ 11-15 per hectare). With rotavator adoption, farmers lose about 284-309 kg of wheat grain and about US$ 93-101 of profits on average per hectare per season, and these penalties increase with longer-term use of the technology. Adoption of rotavator appears to be driven by the cost and time savings for land preparation. Against this backdrop, new policy and extension efforts are required that discourage rotavator use and favour more sustainable tillage technologies.
Keywords: Agricultural productivity; Nepal; impact heterogeneity; propensity score matching; sustainable tillage practices; technology adoption.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Agricultural Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. on behalf of Agricultural Economics Society.