Rogue stem cell clinics

Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):148-154. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-1104.R1.

Abstract

Cell therapies hold significant promise for the treatment of injured or diseased musculoskeletal tissues. However, despite advances in research, there is growing concern about the increasing number of clinical centres around the world that are making unwarranted claims or are performing risky biological procedures. Such providers have been known to recommend, prescribe, or deliver so called 'stem cell' preparations without sufficient data to support their true content and efficacy. In this annotation, we outline the current environment of stem cell-based treatments and the strategies of marketing directly to consumers. We also outline the difficulties in the regulation of these clinics and make recommendations for best practice and the identification and reporting of illegitimate providers. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):148-154.

Keywords: Biologics; Direct to consumer marketing; Regulation; Stem Cells.

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care Facilities / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities / standards*
  • Consumer Product Safety / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Consumer Product Safety / standards
  • Direct-to-Consumer Advertising / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Direct-to-Consumer Advertising / standards*
  • Direct-to-Consumer Advertising / trends
  • Humans
  • Marketing of Health Services / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Marketing of Health Services / standards*
  • Marketing of Health Services / trends
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases / surgery*
  • Patient Safety / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Patient Safety / standards*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards
  • Stem Cell Transplantation / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Stem Cell Transplantation / standards*
  • Stem Cell Transplantation / trends
  • United Kingdom
  • United States