Management of post-puncture bleeding after neurointerventional procedures performed with a large-bore sheath introducer

Abstract

Various adjunctive techniques for neurointerventional procedures require a large-bore sheath introducer, but there is concern that this could result in more puncture site hemorrhagic complications despite using a vascular closure device. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between use of large-bore sheath introducer and post-procedural complications. Between January 2016 and April 2018, 126 neurointerventional procedures were performed in our hospital using 8 or 9 Fr sheath introducer in size and the Angio-Seal STS PLUS (St. Jude Medical, Minnetonka, USA). Hemorrhagic complications were defined as obvious swelling or bleeding at the puncture site or as extravascular bleeding detected by ultrasonography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The procedures were divided into a group with post-puncture bleeding (group B, n = 21) and a group without bleeding (group N, n = 105). Risk factors were compared between the groups according to the incidence of post-puncture bleeding. In addition, we assessed the outcome and approach to hemostasis in the procedures with bleeding. In result, hemorrhagic complications occurred in 21 procedures (17%), and pseudoaneurysm was detected in 4 procedures (3.2%). In 20 of group B (16%), manual compression was performed for an average of 36.4 min. One patient (0.79%) required surgical angioplasty. Risk factors for bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups. None of the patients with bleeding showed a decrease on the modified Rankin Scale. In conclusion, use of a large-bore sheath introducer may increase the incidence of post-puncture bleeding, but the outcome of this complication is acceptable.

Keywords: Angio-Seal; Hemorrhagic complication; Neurointervention.