Discussion points for Bayesian inference
Nat Hum Behav
.
2020 Jun;4(6):561-563.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z.
Authors
Balazs Aczel
1
,
Rink Hoekstra
2
,
Andrew Gelman
3
,
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
4
,
Irene G Klugkist
5
,
Jeffrey N Rouder
6
,
Joachim Vandekerckhove
6
,
Michael D Lee
6
,
Richard D Morey
7
,
Wolf Vanpaemel
8
,
Zoltan Dienes
9
,
Don van Ravenzwaaij
2
Affiliations
1
Institute of Psychology, ELTE, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. aczel.balazs@ppk.elte.hu.
2
Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
3
Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
4
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
6
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
7
School of Psychology, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK.
8
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
9
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
PMID:
31988442
DOI:
10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
No abstract available
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem*
Behavioral Sciences
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Humans
Social Sciences