Improved validation for single particle ICP-MS analysis using a pneumatic nebulizer / microdroplet generator sample introduction system for multi-mode nanoparticle determination

Anal Chim Acta. 2020 Feb 22:1099:16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.043. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

Abstract

This study reports on the development of a single-particle (sp) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) technique suitable for the multi-mode determination of nanoparticle (NP) metal mass fraction and number concentration. The described technique, which is based on a dual inlet system consisting of a pneumatic nebulizer (PN) and a microdroplet generator (MDG), allows for the sequential introduction of ionic metal calibrant solutions and nanoparticle suspensions via all combinations of the two inlets; thus allowing for a combination of three independent modes of analysis. A novel interface, assembled using standard analytical components (a demountable quartz ICP-MS torch, flexible non-conducting silicon tubing and various connectors), was used to interface the dual inlet system to an ICP-MS. The interface provided improved functionality, compared to a previous design. It is now possible to conveniently exchange and introduce standard solutions and samples via all inlet combinations, analyze them, and also wash the sample inlet systems while the whole setup is still connected to an operating ICP-MS. This setup provided seamless and robust operation in a total of three analysis modes, i.e. three ways to independently determine the metal mass fraction and NP number concentration. All three analyses modes could be carried out within a single analytical run lasting approximately 20 min. The unique feature of the described approach is that each analysis mode is based on a different calibration principle, thus constituting an independent way to determine metal mass fractions and nanoparticle number concentrations. Conducting the three independent state-of-the-art analysis, within a single analytical run, improves substantially the validation capabilities of sp-ICP-MS for NP analysis. To assess the technique's analytical performance, Au, Ag and CeO2 nanoparticles were analyzed. The determined average diameters for Au (56.7 ± 1.5 nm), Ag (72.8 ± 3.4 nm) and CeO2 (69.0 ± 6.4 nm) NPs were in close agreement for all three modes of analysis, as well as with the values provided by suppliers' for Au and Ag NPs (56.0 ± 0.5 for Au, 74.6 ± 3.8 nm for Ag). However, the determined average value for CeO2 was much higher than the expected 28.4 ± 10.4 nm, possibly due to NP agglomeration and the inability to detect NPs existing within the lower size range. The determined NP number concentrations, using analysis modes -I and -II, gave recoveries between 91 and 100% for the Au and Ag NP number concentrations. Whereas analysis mode -III showed a recovery of 70-88% for the same materials. Because of the polydispersity, the small size and polyhedral shape of the CeO2 NPs it was not possible to make NP number concentration comparisons for this material.

Keywords: Microdroplet generator; Nanomaterials; Nanoparticles; Single particle ICP-MS.