Purpose: To compare the efficacy of the middle calyx access (MCA) and lower calyx access (LCA) in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones.
Materials and methods: The data of patients with isolated lower pole kidney stones who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy via MCA or LCA between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Pre-, peri-, and postoperative parameters of the groups (LCA group and MCA group) were compared. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: A total of 601 patients with lower pole kidney stones were included in the study. LCA was performed for the initial tract in 400 patients, and MCA was performed in 201 patients. There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, laterality, body mass index, previous operation history, stone burden, duration of fluoroscopy, and stone-free rate between the groups. Operation time was significantly longer in the LCA group (p = 0.041). In the LCA group, additional access was required in 50 cases, which was significantly higher than in the MCA group (p = 0.013). Clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) were present in 28 patients (7%) in the first group (significantly higher vs. MCA: p = 0.044). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of overall complication and transfusion rates.
Conclusions: MCA had superior outcomes in terms of operation time, CIRF rate, hemoglobin drop, and requirement of an additional tract compared to LCA. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of MCA in lower pole kidney stones should be performed to verify our results.
Keywords: Lower calyx access; Middle calyx access; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.