Conducting side experiments termed robustness experiments, to identify features that are stable with respect to rescans, annotation, or other confounding effects is an important element in radiomics research. However, the matter of how to include the finding of these experiments into the model building process still needs to be explored. Three different methods for incorporating prior knowledge into a radiomics modelling process were evaluated: the naïve approach (ignoring feature quality), the most common approach consisting of removing unstable features, and a novel approach using data augmentation for information transfer (DAFIT). Multiple experiments were conducted using both synthetic and publicly available real lung imaging patient data. Ignoring additional information from side experiments resulted in significantly overestimated model performances meaning the estimated mean area under the curve achieved with a model was increased. Removing unstable features improved the performance estimation, while slightly decreasing the model performance, i.e. decreasing the area under curve achieved with the model. The proposed approach was superior both in terms of the estimation of the model performance and the actual model performance. Our experiments show that data augmentation can prevent biases in performance estimation and has several advantages over the plain omission of the unstable feature. The actual gain that can be obtained depends on the quality and applicability of the prior information on the features in the given domain. This will be an important topic of future research.