Background/objectives: The advance in the microvascular surgeries has made successful replantation of amputee fingertip or toe. Anterograde palm venous anastomosis is generally preferred in avulsion distal fingertip trauma surgeries but is technically challenging. The retrograde venous anastomosis is proved to be easy and effective in larger defects hand reconstruction surgeries. The purposes of the analysis were to compare functional and therapeutic outcomes of retrograde palm venous anastomosis against anterograde palm venous anastomosis in the avulsion distal fingertip and thumb microvascular surgery.
Methods: Digits were replanted by retrograde palm venous anastomosis (n = 130, RPVA cohort) or anterograde palm venous anastomosis (n = 220, APVA cohort). The data regarding the survival of transplanted tissues, analgesia, 2-points discrimination, and total active movement after 2-years of surgeries were collected and analyzed.
Results: A higher percentage of digits with survived transplanted tissues found in the RPVA cohort than the APVA cohort (p = 0.004). 2-points discrimination found higher in the APVA cohort than the RPVA cohort (5.22 ± 1.56 mm vs. 4.81 ± 1.39 mm, p = 0.014). The pain was fewer in the RPVA cohort than the APVA cohort (p = 0.041). A total active motion was higher in the RPVA cohort than the APVA cohort (p = 0.025). Anterograde palm venous anastomosis (p = 0.021) were associated with the failure of transplanted digits tissues.
Conclusions: Retrograde palm venous anastomosis had better functional and therapeutic outcomes than anterograde palm venous anastomosis in avulsion distal fingertip trauma.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: 2-Points discrimination; Anterograde palm venous anastomosis; Avulsion distal hand trauma; Microvascular surgery; Retrograde palm venous anastomosis.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.