Initial Experience with Transradial Access for Cerebrovascular Procedures: Is It Feasible and Safe?

World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr:136:e593-e600. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.078. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

Abstract

Background: Despite the proven benefit of transradial access over transfemoral access in cardiac procedures, the transition for cerebrovascular procedures has only been slowly enforced. We present our experience with transradial access in cerebral diagnostic angiographies and neurointerventional procedures.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular procedures in 3 German centers between February 2017 and May 2019. Demographics, technical features, and complications were evaluated.

Results: Transradial access was successful in 40/45 endovascular procedures (89%). Selected catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in 95% of cases (40/42). The rate of procedure-related vascular complications was 2% (1/45).

Conclusions: In this small retrospective series, transradial access proved to be safe and efficient. In the future, it is planned to further promote it as a standard access alternative for more patients.

Keywords: Cerebral angiography; Endovascular therapy; Radial access; Radial artery; Transradial.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / etiology
  • Cerebral Angiography / adverse effects
  • Cerebral Angiography / methods*
  • Endovascular Procedures / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures / methods*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / methods*
  • Patient Safety
  • Radial Artery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spasm / etiology