Prognostic Impact of Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1 Expression and Serum Galectin.3 in Egyptian AML Patients

M A ElBaiomy; S Aref; M El Zaafarany; Sara Atwa; Tamer Akl; Wafaa El-Beshbishi; Shaimaa El-Ashwah; L Ibrahim; M El-Ghonemy

doi:10.1155/2019/2352919

Prognostic Impact of Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1 Expression and Serum Galectin.3 in Egyptian AML Patients

Adv Hematol. 2019 Dec 18:2019:2352919. doi: 10.1155/2019/2352919. eCollection 2019.

Authors

M A ElBaiomy¹, S Aref², M El Zaafarany¹, Sara Atwa¹, Tamer Akl¹, Wafaa El-Beshbishi³, Shaimaa El-Ashwah⁴, L Ibrahim², M El-Ghonemy²

Affiliations

¹ Medical Oncology Unit, Mansoura University Oncology Center, Mansoura, Egypt.
² Hematology Unit, Clinical Pathology Department, Mansoura University, Egypt.
³ Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Egypt.
⁴ Clinical Hematology Unit, Mansoura University Oncology Center, Mansoura, Egypt.

Abstract

Background: Deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway had a role in haematological malignancies. Previous studies reported that lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1) expression and serum Galectin-3 level could affect clinical parameters and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia patients, but as far as we know, no study has addressed their combined effect on AML patients.

Aim: We studied the expression of LEF1 by real-time qPCR and measured serum level of Gal.3 by ELISA technique in peripheral blood of 69 AML patients and correlated it with different clinicopathological criteria of patients, response, PFS and OS.

Results: We found high expression (LEF1^high) was associated with better OS (p = 0.02) and EFS (p = 0.019) compared to LEF1^low, low serum Gal.3 level had better OS (p = 0.014) and EFS (p = 0.02) compared to high serum Gal.3 level. LEF1^high less likely to carry a FLT3-ITD (p = 0.047) compared to LEF1^low patient, also LEF1^high characterized by favorable risk (p = 0.02) than LEF1^low patients. While patients with higher Gal-3 levels characterized by poor risk (p = 0.02) than lower Gal.3 lels, also more likely to carry a FLT3-ITD with borderline significance (p = 0.054). Combined LEF1^high/Gal.3 low patients had lower baseline blast percentages (p = 0.02), favorable risk (p = 0.01), less likely to carry FLT3-ITD (p = 0.02), higher CR rate (p = 0.055), shorter time to CR (0.001) than other groups. Among high Gal.3 level group, LEF1^highexpression improved OS and EFS (20 and 15 months respectively) vs LEF1^low expression (13 and 8 months respectively).

Conclusion: We conclude that high LEF1 expression was a favorable prognostic marker which can define AML patient risk and outcome independent from assessing the serum galectin.3 level.