Comparison of Caregiver Engagement in Telepractice and In-person Family-Centered Early Intervention

J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Jan 3;25(1):33-42. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz037.

Abstract

Telepractice-specifically, the use of high-speed internet and interactive videoconferencing technology to deliver real-time audio and video communications between the family and the practitioner-is gaining acceptance as an alternative means of providing family-centered early intervention to families of children who are deaf and hard of hearing. This study examined whether caregivers' reported perceptions of self-efficacy and involvement differed when early intervention was delivered in-person and through telepractice. The Scale of Parental Involvement and Self-Efficacy (SPISE) was used to evaluate perceptions of two groups of caregivers: one that received early intervention in-person (n = 100) and a group who received services through telepractice (n = 41). Results indicated that mode of delivery of services was not related to caregivers' perceptions of their self-efficacy or involvement. Further analysis revealed that although certain caregiver or child characteristics did influence some aspects of caregivers' beliefs about their self-efficacy or involvement, the effect of those variables was similar across both modes of delivery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Attitude to Health
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Deafness / psychology
  • Deafness / therapy*
  • Early Intervention, Educational / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Parents / psychology*
  • Patient Participation / psychology
  • Self Efficacy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Telemedicine* / methods
  • Videoconferencing*