Does the Cerebellum Implement or Select Geometries? A Speculative Note

Cerebellum. 2020 Apr;19(2):336-342. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01095-5.

Abstract

During evolution, living systems, actively interacting with their environment, developed the ability, through sensorimotor contingencies, to construct functional spaces shaping their perception and their movements. These geometries were modularly embedded in specific functional neuro-architectures. In particular, human movements were shown to obey several empirical laws, such as the 2/3 power law, isochrony, or jerk minimization principles, which constrain and adapt motor planning and execution. Outstandingly, such laws can be deduced from a combination of Euclidean, affine, and equi-affine geometries, whose neural correlates have been partly detected in several brain areas including the cerebellum and the basal ganglia. Reviving Pellionisz and Llinas general hypothesis regarding the cerebrum and the cerebellum as geometric machines, we speculate that the cerebellum should be involved in implementing and/or selecting task-specific geometries for motor and cognitive skills. More precisely, the cerebellum is assumed to compute forward internal models to help specific cortical and subcortical regions to select appropriate geometries among, at least, Euclidean and affine geometries. We emphasize that the geometrical role of the cerebellum deserves a renewal of interest, which may provide a better understanding of its specific contributions to motor and associative (cognitive) functions.

Keywords: Affine; Brain; Category; Cerebellum; Equi-affine; Geometry; Group; Movement; Sensori-motor contingencies; Space; Timing; Topos.

Publication types

  • Letter

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cerebellum / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Models, Neurological*