Relationship between scapular initial position and scapular movement during dynamic motions

PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0227313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227313. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Optimal scapular position and movement are necessary for normal function of the shoulder joint and it is essential to focus on scapula in the rehabilitation for shoulder disorders. The aim of this study was to discover the relationship between the scapular initial position and scapular movement during dynamic motions in healthy young men. Thirty-four men participated in this study. The scapular angles at initial position and in elevation and lowering during flexion and abduction were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device. The scapular movements from 30° to 120° during flexion and abduction were calculated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to analyze the relationship between the scapular initial position and scapular movements. For upward rotation and posterior tilt of the scapula, there were significant positive correlations between the scapular initial position and scapular movement during flexion and abduction. For internal rotation, there were significant positive correlations, except 90° in lowering phase and 120° in both phases. While the humeral elevation increased, the correlation coefficients tended to decrease. Except for the internal rotation our results clarified the interactions between the scapular initial position and scapular movement during dynamic motions in healthy young men. The tendency of the decrease in correlation coefficient with elevation angle was shown.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Humans
  • Humerus / physiology
  • Male
  • Range of Motion, Articular*
  • Rotation*
  • Scapula / physiology*
  • Shoulder Joint / physiology*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists (18J12658). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.