Epigenetic Modifications in Peripheral Blood as Potential Noninvasive Biomarker of Diabetic Retinopathy

Arul J Duraisamy; Rakesh Radhakrishnan; Berhane Seyoum; Gary W Abrams; Renu A Kowluru

doi:10.1167/tvst.8.6.43

Epigenetic Modifications in Peripheral Blood as Potential Noninvasive Biomarker of Diabetic Retinopathy

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 18;8(6):43. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.6.43. eCollection 2019 Nov.

Authors

Arul J Duraisamy^{1

2}, Rakesh Radhakrishnan¹, Berhane Seyoum³, Gary W Abrams¹, Renu A Kowluru¹

Affiliations

¹ Wayne State University, Department of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
² PerkinElmer Health Sciences Pvt Ltd., Tharamani, India.
³ Wayne State University, Endocrinology, Detroit, MI, USA.

Abstract

Purpose: Progression of diabetic retinopathy is related to the duration and severity of hyperglycemia, and after 25 years of diabetes, 90% of patients show some signs of retinopathy. Despite initiation of many retinal molecular/biochemical abnormalities, including mitochondrial damage and epigenetic modifications, the disease remains asympotomatic in the initial stages. Our goal is to examine the utility of DNA methylation as a possible biomarker of diabetic retinopathy.

Methods: Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from the buffy coat, isolated from blood of diabetic patients with proliferative (PDR) or no retinopathy (No-DR), and nondiabetic subjects (CONT). Methylation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), especially its D-Loop (the site of mtDNA transcription/replication), was quantified by methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and methyl-specific PCR techniques. Results were confirmed in purified mtDNA. The specific D-Loop region with the highest DNA methylation was identified using five overlapping primers, and DNMT1 binding was quantified by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Promoter DNA methylation of DNA mismatch repair (MLH1) and superoxide scavenging (SOD2) enzymes were also quantified.

Results: Compared to CONT, D-Loop methylation was higher in PDR and No-DR groups, and the D-Loop region responsible for encoding the majority of the mtDNA-encoded genes had significantly higher methylation in the PDR group versus No-DR. Similarly, compared to No-DR, the PDR group also had hypermethylated MHL1 and SOD2 promoters.

Conclusions: Blood from PDR patients have higher DNA methylation, than seen in diabetic patients without retinopathy. Thus, DNA methylation can be used as a possible biomarker of diabetic retinopathy.

Translational relevance: DNA methylation status in the blood of diabetic patients could serve as a potential noninvasive biomarker of retinopathy, and also an important readout parameter for testing longitudinal outcome of novel therapeutics for this blinding disease.

Keywords: DNA methylation; biomarker; diabetic retinopathy; epigenetics; mitochondrial DNA.

Abstract

Grants and funding