Attitudinal Acceptance of Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Nigeria and Tanzania: An Exploration Into Target Reference Groups Order and Affiliation of Authorship

Melissa Meinhart; Ilana Seff; Gary L Darmstadt; Ann M Weber; Lindsay Stark

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.006

Attitudinal Acceptance of Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Nigeria and Tanzania: An Exploration Into Target Reference Groups Order and Affiliation of Authorship

J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;66(1S):S3-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.006.

Authors

Melissa Meinhart¹, Ilana Seff², Gary L Darmstadt³, Ann M Weber³, Lindsay Stark⁴

Affiliations

¹ Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, New York.
² Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
³ Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
⁴ George Warren Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: lindsaystark@wustl.edu.

Abstract

Purpose: Attitudinal programming for the prevention of intimate partner violence (IPV) among adolescents and young adults often focuses on whom to target based on gender or age; yet other pivotal junctures may relate to when to intervene, such as critical events (e.g., marriage). Using data from the nationally representative Violence Against Children Survey in Nigeria and Tanzania, this study examines the gendered association of acceptance of IPV across 3 reference groups-age, marital status, and education attainment-for male and female adolescents and young adults.

Methods: Data were analyzed from a sample of 2,437 and 1,771 males in Nigeria and Tanzania, respectively, and 1,766 and 1,968 females in each respective country. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds of agreeing with at least one of 5 scenarios when it is acceptable for a husband to beat his wife. A second model examined how experience of IPV in the prior 12 months influences the attitudinal outcome for females.

Results: Age was not found to be a significant predictor for attitudinal acceptance of IPV in either country or for either gender. Level of schooling was found to be a significant predictor for decreased odds of attitudinal acceptance of IPV for males but not females in both countries. In contrast, being married was associated with IPV acceptance for females in Tanzania (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.56; confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.03-2.37) and Nigeria (aOR: 1.66; CIs: 1.19-2.30), but not for males. The significance of marriage for females in Nigeria remained (aOR: 1.67; CIs: 1.20-2.33), even adjusted for past 12-month IPV experience (aOR: 1.85; CIs: 1.11-3.07) and the interaction of IPV experience and marriage (aOR: 3.42, CIs: 1.72-6.80).

Conclusions: Among adolescents and young adults in Nigeria and Tanzania, there are gendered associations for attitudinal acceptance of IPV. Marriage appears to be a strong predictor for females, even adjusted for IPV experience, thus indicating that there is something unique to marriage among female adolescents and young adults that influences acceptance of IPV.

Keywords: Adolescents; Intimate partner violence; Violence exposure; Young adults.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Adolescent
Attitude*
Female
Humans
Intimate Partner Violence / psychology*
Male
Nigeria
Risk Factors
Social Norms
Tanzania
Young Adult