Comparing two different techniques applied for the extraction of marine pore water samples from sediments, the well-established whole round (WR) method and the more recent Rhizon method, in terms of their effects on stable calcium isotope ratios in extracted pore waters, we recognize a systematic offset between the two sampling methods. Higher δ44/40Ca values are associated with lower Ca concentrations for the Rhizon sampling technique and lower δ44/40Ca values are associated with higher Ca concentrations for the corresponding WR-derived pore water samples. Models involving Rayleigh fractionation and mixing calculation suggest that the observed offset is most likely caused by a combined process of CaCO3 precipitation and ion exchange taking place during Rhizon sampling-induced CO2 degassing. Changing pressure, extraction time or extraction yield during WR pressing does not lead to a variation in δ44/40Ca, indicating that no Ca isotope fractionation takes place during the sampling of pore water. On the basis of analytical and modelling results, WR samples appear to provide δ44/40Ca values that are more representative of the 'true' pore water isotopic composition. While the difference between the sampling techniques is close to the present-day analytical precision of Ca isotope analysis, it may become more relevant with increasing analytical precision in the future.
Keywords: Calcium-40; IODP; Rhizon; calcium-44; isotope fractionation; isotope geochemistry; pore water; whole round.