Adjunctive ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after monotherapy failure

Joseph Patrik Hornak; Seher Anjum; David Reynoso

doi:10.1177/2049936119886504

Adjunctive ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after monotherapy failure

Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 7:6:2049936119886504. doi: 10.1177/2049936119886504. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

Authors

Joseph Patrik Hornak¹, Seher Anjum², David Reynoso³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
² National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.
³ The University of Texas Medical Branch, Division of Infectious Diseases, 301 University Blvd., Rte. 0435, Marvin Graves Building 4.210H, Galveston, TX, 77555-0435, USA.

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) may fail to improve with standard monotherapy, particularly in patients with multifocal infection, incomplete source control, or persistent bacteremia. Synergy observed in vitro between ceftaroline (CPT) and daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) may translate into clinical benefit. Here, we describe our experience with DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT for complicated MRSA-B after monotherapy failure.

Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with DAP/CPT or VAN/CPT for MRSA-B after monotherapy failure from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2018.

Results: We identified 11 instances of combination therapy in 10 patients (DAP/CPT = 6, VAN/CPT = 5) with 1 patient receiving VAN/CPT followed by DAP/CPT. Rates of multifocal infection, incomplete source control, persistent bacteremia, and infective endocarditis were high (100%, 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). Combination therapy was initiated most commonly for persistent bacteremia (60%). When patients were persistently bacteremic, median preceding duration was 13 days and median time to clearance was 3 days. Total microbiologic cure rate was 100%. There were zero instances of bacteremia relapse at 30 days (30D) or 60 days (60D). All-cause 30D and 60D mortality rates were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Combination therapy demonstrated success in diverse cases of refractory MRSA-B, including instances of persistent bacteremia paired with incomplete source control. Optimal timing and therapeutic cadence for combination therapy remain unclear. Our findings suggest that DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT can be considered for complicated MRSA bacteremia when other treatment options fail or are unavailable. We propose persistent bacteremia with incomplete source control to be a clinical niche particularly worthy of further investigation.

Keywords: MRSA bacteremia; antibiotic combination therapy; antibiotic salvage; antimicrobial synergy; ceftaroline; daptomycin; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; persistent bacteremia; vancomycin.