Identifying and addressing training deficiencies in the examination of cryptorchidism-a quality improvement study

Abstract

Background: Accurate and timely diagnosis of cryptorchidism by primary care providers (PCPs) is critical to oncologic and fertility outcomes. Physical exam is the mainstay of diagnosis, but little is known about PCPs' skills in examining cryptorchid patients. Patients referred to surgeons for cryptorchidism often have normal or retractile testes on exam, and delayed or missed diagnosis of cryptorchidism may contribute to advanced age at surgical intervention. Previous studies on cryptorchidism have not investigated the baseline training, confidence, and/or exam skills of providers.

Objective: The authors aimed to define baseline training and provider confidence in the exam of cryptorchid patients and to improve examiner confidence using bedside teaching with a pediatric urologist. Secondarily, baseline training and confidence were correlated to skill.

Study design: Medical students, family medicine, pediatrics, and urology residents, and pediatric attendings completed surveys on baseline training and self-reported confidence in the examination of cryptorchid patients at an academic institution from 2017 to 2018. N.G.K. (pediatric urologist) proctored examinations of cryptorchid patients and provided standardized grades and individualized feedback. Surveys were readministered after 3 months. Non-parametric comparison tests were performed to determine intervention effect and compare subgroups.

Results: Ninety-two respondents participated. 62% reported little to no formal training on the scrotal exam, 50% were self-taught, and 20% defined undescended testis incorrectly. Confidence increased with level of training, comparing attendings to residents to students (P < 0.001). Those who learned from a mentor had higher baseline confidence than those who did not (P < 0.01). Baseline confidence and amount of formal training positively correlated with exam skill as graded during proctored sessions (n = 59, P < 0.01). Provider confidence was higher after proctored exams (Fig. 2, n = 32, P < 0.0001).

Discussion: Significant training deficiencies exist in the examination of cryptorchid patients. A single proctored exam with a pediatric urologist can improve provider confidence and may improve exam skills. A rotation with pediatric urology, including proctored exams of cryptorchid patients, has become standard practice for pediatric trainees at the authors institution as a result of this study.

Conclusions: While further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of bedside teaching and its impact on accurate and timely diagnosis of cryptorchidism, implementation of the authors quality improvement recommendations at other teaching institutions would help address training deficiencies in the examination of cryptorchid patients.

Keywords: Cryptorchidism; Medical education; Physical exam; Primary care; Quality improvement.