Associations between air pollution and cardio-respiratory physiological measures in older adults exercising outdoors

Int J Environ Health Res. 2021 Dec;31(8):901-914. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1699506. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Abstract

We examined whether exercising indoors vs. outdoors reduced the cardio-respiratory effects of outdoor air pollution. Adults ≥55 were randomly assigned to exercise indoors when the Air Quality Health Index was ≥5 and outdoors on other days (intervention group, n = 37), or outdoors everyday (control group, n = 35). Both groups completed cardio-respiratory measurements before and after exercise for up to 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effect regression models. In the control group, an interquartile range increase in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was associated with increases of 1.4% in heart rate (standard error (SE) = 0.7%) and 5.6% (SE = 2.6%) in malondialdehyde, and decreases of 5.6% (SE = 2.5%) to 16.5% (SE = 7.5%) in heart rate variability measures. While the hypothesized benefit of indoor vs. outdoor exercise could not be demonstrated due to an insufficient number of intervention days (n = 2), the study provides evidence of short-term effects of air pollution in older adults. ISRCTN #26552763.

Keywords: Air pollution; cardiovascular physiology; exercise; respiratory function tests.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Air Pollutants / adverse effects
  • Air Pollutants / analysis
  • Air Pollution / adverse effects*
  • Air Pollution / analysis
  • Environmental Exposure / adverse effects*
  • Environmental Exposure / analysis
  • Exercise / physiology*
  • Female
  • Heart Rate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malondialdehyde / urine
  • Middle Aged
  • Oxidative Stress
  • Particulate Matter / adverse effects
  • Particulate Matter / analysis
  • Regression Analysis
  • Respiratory Function Tests

Substances

  • Air Pollutants
  • Particulate Matter
  • Malondialdehyde