A simple way to improve a conventional A/O-MBR for high simultaneous carbon and nutrient removal from synthetic municipal wastewater

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0214976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214976. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

In this study, two anoxic-oxic membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR) systems, i.e. conventional and biofilm anoxic-oxic-membrane bioreactors (C-A/O-MBR and BF-A/O-MBR, respectively), were operated in parallel under conditions of complete sludge retention for the purposes of comparing system performance and microbial community composition. Moreover, with the microbial communities, comparisons were made between the adhesive stage and the suspended stage. High average removal of COD, NH4+-N and TN was achieved in both systems. However, TP removal efficiency was remarkably higher in BF-A/O-MBR when compared with C-A/O-MBR. TP mass balance analysis suggested that under complete sludge retention, polyurethane sponges that were added into the anoxic tank played a key role in both phosphorus release and accumulation. The qPCR analysis showed that sponge biomass could maintain a higher level of abundance of total bacteria than the suspended sludge. Meanwhile, AOB and denitrifiers were enriched in the suspended sludge but not in the sponge biomass. Results of illumina sequencing reveal that the compacted sponge in BF-A/O-MBR could promote the growth of bacteria involved in nutrient removal and reduce the amount of filamentous and bacterial growth that is related to membrane fouling in the suspended sludge.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aerobiosis
  • Biofilms
  • Biomass
  • Bioreactors* / microbiology
  • Carbon / isolation & purification*
  • DNA, Bacterial / genetics
  • DNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
  • Microbiota / genetics
  • Nitrogen / isolation & purification
  • Nutrients / isolation & purification
  • Sewage / chemistry
  • Sewage / microbiology
  • Wastewater / chemistry*
  • Water Purification / instrumentation
  • Water Purification / methods*
  • Water Quality

Substances

  • DNA, Bacterial
  • Sewage
  • Waste Water
  • Carbon
  • Nitrogen

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.