Risk factors, diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Dec;16(12):1063-1070. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1696673. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

Abstract

Introduction: Although a relatively rare complication, the incidence and prevalence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is certainly rising. This is mainly due to the number of arthroplasties performed each year and our ability to capture more cases. There is currently no consensus in the optimal diagnosis and management of the infected total hip arthroplasty. Various management techniques have been described in literature.Areas covered: We discuss and summarize the literature in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) including next-generation sequencing. An in-depth critical analysis of the biomarkers and the novel tests available in the market is reviewed including the evolving nature of the diagnostic criteria for PJI. The key issues in managing infected THA are identified.Expert commentary: The senior authors' expert opinion on diagnostic criteria is discussed. We also stress the importance of tissue/fluid analysis of microbiology and histology being key to diagnosis of PJI. The indications of one-stage versus two-stage revision arthroplasty is examined, including techniques for successful one-stage revision.

Keywords: PJI; alpha defensin; next generation sequencing; one stage versus two stage; prosthetic joint infection.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / blood
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / diagnosis*
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / etiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / therapy*
  • Reoperation
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Biomarkers