In vivo study assessed meropenem and amikacin combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), especially for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), is an emerging cause that pose a significant threat to public health. However, efficient therapy has not been established. We assessed the antimicrobial efficacy of meropenem (MEPM) and amikacin (AMK) combination therapy.

Material and methods: Total eight isolates of Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, including CRE and/or CPE have carbapenemase genes were used. The relationship between phenotype and in vivo efficacy was assessed in neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Efficacy was determined using the change in bacterial density and survival rate.

Results: The combination therapy showed enhanced antimicrobial activities against CRE+/CPE+ and CRE+/CPE-K. pneumoniae isolates than MEPM monotherapy (0.63 ± 0.04 vs. 2.56 ± 0.24 ⊿log₁₀ cfu/mL, p < 0.05; -1.05 ± 0.15 vs. -0.48 ± 0.30 ⊿log₁₀ cfu/mL, p < 0.05). Likewise, the combination therapy showed enhanced antimicrobial activities against CRE+/CPE+ and CRE+/CPE-E. coli isolates than MEPM monotherapy (0.90 ± 0.68 vs. 1.86 ± 0.23 ⊿log₁₀ cfu/mL, p < 0.05; -1.81 ± 0.06 vs. -0.88 ± 0.23 ⊿log₁₀ cfu/mL, p < 0.05). Also, combination therapy group showed similar to higher survival rates in CRE + E. coli infection mice, compared to MEPM monotherapy group.

Conclusion: Our results are the first supportive data to threat CRE infections with combination therapy of MEPM and AMK with in vivo model. The current results verify the promising utility of the combination therapy with MEPM and AMK against CRE isolates with a wide range of MEPM MICs.

Keywords: Amikacin(AMK); Carbapenem-resistant; Combination therapy; Enterobacteriaceae(CRE); Meropenem(MEPM).