An Empirical Study of Applying Statistical Disclosure Control Methods to Public Health Research

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):4519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224519.

Abstract

Patient data or information collected from public health and health care surveys are of great research value. Usually, the data contain sensitive personal information. Doctors, nurses, or researchers in the public health and health care sector do not analyze the available datasets or survey data on their own, and may outsource the tasks to third parties. Even though all identifiers such as names and ID card numbers are removed, there may still be some occasions in which an individual can be re-identified via the demographic or particular information provided in the datasets. Such data privacy issues can become an obstacle in health-related research. Statistical disclosure control (SDC) is a useful technique used to resolve this problem by masking and designing released data based on the original data. Whilst ensuring the released data can satisfy the needs of researchers for data analysis, there is high protection of the original data from disclosure. In this research, we discuss the statistical properties of two SDC methods: the General Additive Data Perturbation (GADP) method and the Gaussian Copula General Additive Data Perturbation (CGADP) method. An empirical study is provided to demonstrate how we can apply these two SDC methods in public health research.

Keywords: data perturbation; data privacy; data utility; health care; risk.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Confidentiality / standards*
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Empirical Research
  • Humans
  • Public Health*
  • Research Design*