Systematic review of child restraint system interventions (2007-2018)

Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(8):866-872. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1666372. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review and summarize articles evaluating the effectiveness of child restraint system (CRS) interventions targeting parents/caregivers' knowledge of, overall rates of and/or proper use of CRSs published in a recent time period.Methods: Using multiple databases, we identified peer-reviewed journal articles published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018 using selected key search terms. Inclusion criteria were: (1) evaluation of an intervention/program for child passenger safety targeting a parent or caregiver of a child (2) quantitative data-based results (i.e., change in knowledge, behavior, or observed outcomes), (3) English-language, and (4) peer-reviewed journal publication. Through a systematic review process and peer consensus, n = 23 articles met inclusion criteria. References of these articles were reviewed for inclusion using the same process and n = 12 additional articles were identified.Results: A total of n = 35 articles met inclusion criteria. Of the n = 35 articles, n = 9 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), n = 4 were cluster RCTs, n = 11 were nonrandomized trials, and n = 11 were pretest post-test studies. Types of interventions included face-to-face education (n = 26), web/video-based education (n = 8) or written educational materials (n = 1). Of the articles reviewed, n = 20 involved distribution of free or subsidized CRSs to some or all subjects. N = 20 articles involved trained CRS technicians and/or CRS installation check-points. In terms of outcomes measured, n = 3 articles assessed changes in knowledge of CRS use, n = 22 assessed changes in CRS behaviors (which includes self-report or observed behavior change), and n = 10 assessed changes in both CRS knowledge and behaviors. All articles (n = 3) that measured changes in knowledge as their only outcome demonstrated positive effects while articles measuring behavioral outcomes (self-report or observed) (n = 32) had mixed results.Conclusions: This review included a wide range of articles of heterogeneous methodologies, sample sizes, and outcomes measured. Although different approaches to CRS interventions were effective in increasing awareness and knowledge, the effects on CRS use behaviors - whether self-reported or observed - were mixed. Future research is needed to increase appropriate CRS use and reduce the burden of motor vehicle crash-related injuries among children.

Keywords: Child restraints; booster seat; child safety; child seat; interventions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Traffic*
  • Caregivers
  • Child
  • Child Restraint Systems / statistics & numerical data*
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Health Education
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination
  • Internet
  • Parents / education*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Risk-Taking
  • Safety
  • Wounds and Injuries / prevention & control*