Introduction Neurosurgeons trained in the US are rigorously educated on the surgical management of neurosurgical conditions. These neurosurgeons have been trained through one of two avenues: the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) or the American Osteopathic Association (AOA). With the formation of a single accreditation system from the AOA and ACGME accrediting bodies and significant changes introduced in the training of neurosurgeons from both bodies, we sought to identify common practice parameters and perceptions of preparedness of AOA-trained neurosurgeons. Methods A survey was conducted through the neurosurgery section of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS), requesting responses from attending neurosurgeons who completed AOA neurosurgery residency. Responses were obtained through an anonymous, web-based system using single-select multiple-choice questions. Results In total, 52 neurosurgeons participated in the survey. The majority of the 52 respondents practiced in non-academic settings in urban areas and were exposed to a wide variety of practice environments in terms of case volume and clinical responsibilities. Significantly, 96.15% of the respondents said they felt adequately prepared for neurosurgical practice after their AOA training. Conclusion Overall, this study highlights both the similarities and variances in practices of osteopathic neurosurgeons. The majority of the participants feel that their training has appropriately prepared them for practice and they are skilled surgeons capable of caring for the safety and well-being of numerous patients in a variety of settings. Most of them practice primarily in private-practice settings at urban centers. Overall, osteopathic neurosurgeons trained in AOA programs report that their training has equipped them well for careers in neurosurgery.
Keywords: aoa; liability; medical education; neurosurgery; osteopathic; perception; preparedness; single accreditation; survey; training.
Copyright © 2019, Brazdzionis et al.