[Acetabular revision arthroplasty with a novel cementless augment-and-modular-cage system (MRS-C) : Surgical technique and preliminary clinical results]

Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Jun;32(3):248-261. doi: 10.1007/s00064-019-00637-8. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Objective: Optimal reconstruction of acetabular anatomy and primarily stable bridging even of large bone defects in hip revision surgery by intraoperative cementless application of highly modular components of the MRS-TITAN Comfort (MRS-C) system according to the augment-and-modular-cage principle.

Indications: Acetabular defect situations in hip revision surgery, hereditary/acquired acetabular deformities, severe secondary hip osteoarthritis.

Contraindications: Extended periacetabular defects of the dorsal pillar, pelvic discontinuities, persisting posttraumatic or periprosthetic infections, lack of intraoperative bony anchorage options.

Surgical technique: Conventional positioning. Flexible selection of approach (posterolateral, anterolateral or transgluteal) to the hip joint, if possible using a previous approach. Implant removal, preparation and intraoperative acetabular defect evaluation. Optional impaction bone grafting for biological downsizing. Selection of modular components and augments depending on the defect. Preparation of the obturator foramen for anchorage of the caudal flange. Optional preparation of the os ilium for additional fixation of the cage with flanges. Fixation with polyaxial screws and selection of version/inclination of the cup component. Selection of the inlay (polyethylene/ceramic).

Postoperative management: Partial weight-bearing with 20 kg body-weight for 6 weeks with crutches. Prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and heterotopic ossification. Additional adapted antibiotic therapy in cases of infection.

Results: A minimum 1‑year follow-up of 42 patients showed significant improvements of Harris Hip Scores (p < 0.0001), adequate reconstruction of the physiologic center of rotation (x-ray controlled in the vertical plane, referenced to the contralateral side), and a clear reduction of preoperative leg length discrepancies. No significant changes in range of motion. No implant-associated complications noted. Based on the short follow-up results, the implant proves as suitable for reconstruction of even large acetabular bone defects.

Keywords: Acetabulum; Hip joint; Hip osteoarthritis; Modular cup arthroplasty; Revision surgery.

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip* / methods
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation*
  • Treatment Outcome