A Review of Techniques, Time Demand, Radiation Exposure, and Outcomes of Skin-anchored Intraoperative 3D Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):E465-E476. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003310.

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Objective: To describe our technique for and evaluate the time demand, radiation exposure and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative three-dimensional navigation (ION) in minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar surgery, and to compare these parameters to 2D fluoroscopy for MI-TLIF.

Summary of background data: Limited visualization of anatomic landmarks and narrow access corridor in MIS procedures result in greater reliance on image guidance. Although two-dimensional fluoroscopy has historically been used, ION is gaining traction.

Methods: Patients who underwent MIS lumbar microdiscectomy, laminectomy, or MI-TLIF using skin-anchored ION and MI-TLIF by the same surgeon using 2D fluoroscopy were selected. Operative variables, radiation exposure, and short-term outcomes of all procedures were summarized. Time-demand and radiation exposure of fluoroscopy and ION for MI-TLIF were compared.

Results: Of the 326 patients included, 232 were in the ION cohort (92 microdiscectomies, 65 laminectomies, and 75 MI-TLIFs) and 94 in the MI-TLIF using 2D fluoroscopy cohort. Time for ION setup and image acquisition was a median of 22 to 24 minutes. Total fluoroscopy time was a median of 10 seconds for microdiscectomy, 9 for laminectomy, and 26 for MI-TLIF. Radiation dose was a median of 15.2 mGy for microdiscectomy, 16.6 for laminectomy, and 44.6 for MI-TLIF, of this, 93%, 95%, and 37% for microdiscectomy, laminectomy, and MI-TLIF, respectively were for ION image acquisition, with the rest attributable to the procedure. There were no wrong-level surgeries. Compared with fluoroscopy, ION for MI-TLIF resulted in lower operative times (92 vs. 108 min, P < 0.0001), fluoroscopy time (26 vs. 144 s, P < 0.0001), and radiation dose (44.6 vs. 63.1 mGy, P = 0.002), with equivalent time-demand and length of stay. ION lowered the radiation dose by 29% for patients and 55% for operating room personnel.

Conclusion: Skin-anchored ION does not increase time-demand compared with fluoroscopy, is feasible, safe and accurate, and results in low radiation exposure.

Level of evidence: 3.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Diskectomy / adverse effects
  • Diskectomy / methods
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy / adverse effects
  • Fluoroscopy / methods
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / adverse effects
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
  • Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring / adverse effects
  • Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring / methods*
  • Laminectomy / adverse effects
  • Laminectomy / methods
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Neuronavigation / adverse effects
  • Neuronavigation / methods
  • Operative Time*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiation Exposure* / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Skin / diagnostic imaging
  • Spinal Fusion / adverse effects
  • Spinal Fusion / methods