Exploration of Efficacy and Safety of Interventions for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis

Li Mei; Mu Fengqun; Han Qian; Su Dongpo; Guo Zhenzhong; Chen Tong

doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.177

Exploration of Efficacy and Safety of Interventions for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis

World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr:136:382-389.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.177. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

Authors

Li Mei¹, Mu Fengqun², Han Qian¹, Su Dongpo¹, Guo Zhenzhong¹, Chen Tong³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei Province, China.
² Department of Neurology, Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei Province, China.
³ Department of Neurosurgery, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei Province, China. Electronic address: ct.1973@163.com.

PMID: 31698131
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.177

Abstract

Objective: To explore whether endoscopy surgery (ES) and extraventricular drainage (EVD) combined with intraventricular fibrinolytic (IVF) are superior to EVD alone in patients with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and to determine which procedure is more suitable in such patients.

Methods: We searched the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies comparing ≥2 different interventions in patients with IVH were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed using software Stata 13.0 and Revman 5.3.

Results: Compared with the EVD-alone intervention, the ES regimen, EVD combined with urokinase (UK), and EVD combined with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimens all resulted in better survival and prognosis in patients with IVH. For both survival rate and prognosis, the order from best to worst was ES, EVD combined with UK, EVD combined with rt-PA, and EVD-alone. However, EVD combined with IVF had a high risk of intracranial rebleeding; the order of intracranial rebleeding risk from lowest to highest was ES, EVD-alone, EVD combined with rt-PA, and EVD combined with UK. The risk of intracranial infection in EVD combined with rt-PA was lower than that of EVD-alone, but EVD combined with UK also had a higher risk than did EVD-alone. The risk of intracranial infection from lowest to the highest was ES, EVD combined with rt-PA, EVD-alone, and EVD combined with UK.

Conclusions: Our analysis showed that ES is more suitable for patients with IVH. ES not only improved the survival and prognosis but also had the lowest risk of ventriculoperitoneal shunt and intracranial rebleeding or infection.

Keywords: Endoscopy surgery; Extraventricular drainage; Intraventricular fibrinolytic; Intraventricular hemorrhage; Network meta-analysis.

Publication types

Meta-Analysis
Review

MeSH terms

Cerebral Ventricles / surgery*
Humans
Intracranial Hemorrhages / surgery*
Network Meta-Analysis
Neurosurgical Procedures / adverse effects*
Neurosurgical Procedures / methods*
Patient Safety