Background: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique can facilitate the distal anastomosis of total arch replacement (TAR); therefore, the technique is increasingly being used in TAR cases. However, identifying suitable patients remains controversial. This study analyzes the outcome of TAR using FET and clarifies the indications for using FET.
Methods: Patients who underwent TAR between January 2008 and December 2018 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: that is, patients treated with conventional TAR (cTAR group, n = 39) and those treated with TAR using FET (TAR-FET group, n = 76). Early and late outcomes were compared.
Results: The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the TAR-FET group (447.0 ± 82.1 min) than in the cTAR group (509.4 ± 123.9 min) (P < 0.01). Likewise, circulatory arrest time was significantly shorter in the TAR-FET group (29.0 ± 7.8 min) than in the cTAR group (64.2 ± 20.2 min) (P < 0.001). Postoperative renal function tended to be preserved in the TAR-FET group. Recurrent nerve palsy was less frequent in the TAR-FET group (9.2%) compared with the cTAR group (25.6%) (P < 0.05). Patients with chronic aortic dissection tended to undergo reintervention more frequently following TAR using the FET technique.
Conclusions: The FET technique contributed to save operation and circulatory arrest times during TAR and seemed less invasive in terms of renal function and less-frequent recurrent nerve palsy. Considering posttreatment reintervention, however, care should be taken in its application to chronic aortic dissection.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.