[Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Short Text]

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.017. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objective: To determine the management of patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes.

Methods: Synthesis of the literature from the PubMed and Cochrane databases and the recommendations of French and foreign societies and colleges.

Results: Term prelabor rupture of membranes is considered a physiological process up to 12hours of rupture (Professional consensus). In case of expectant management and with a low rate of antibiotic prophylaxis, home care compared to hospitalization could be associated with an increase in neonatal infections (LE3), especially in case of group B streptococcus colonization (LE3). Home care is therefore not recommended (Grade C). In the absence of spontaneous labor within 12hours of rupture, antibiotic prophylaxis could reduce the risk of maternal intrauterine infection but not of neonatal infection (LE3). Its use after 12hours of rupture in term prelabor rupture of the membranes is therefore recommended (Grade C). When antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, intravenous beta-lactams are recommended (Grade C). Induction of labor with oxytocin (LE1), prostaglandin E2 (LE1) or misoprostol (LE1), is associated with shorter rupture of membranes to delivery intervals when compared to expectant management. Compared with expectant management, immediate induction of labor is not associated with lower rates of neonatal infection (LE1), even among women with a positive streptococcus B vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the risk of neonatal infection (Grade B). Induction of labor is not associated with an increase or decrease in the cesarean delivery rate (LE2), whatever parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (Grade B). No induction method (oxytocin, dinoprostone, misoprostol or Foley® catheter) has demonstrated superiority over another, whether to reduce rate of intrauterine or neonatal infection, rate of cesarean delivery or to shorten rupture of membranes to delivery intervals regardless of Bishop's score and parity.

Conclusion: Term prelabor rupture of membranes is a frequent event. A 12-hour delay without onset of spontaneous labor was chosen to differentiate a physiological condition from a potentially unsafe situation justifying an antibiotic prophylaxis. Expectant management or induction of labor can both be proposed, even in case of positive screening for streptococcus B, depending on the patient's wishes and maternity units' organization (Professional consensus).

Publication types

  • Practice Guideline

MeSH terms

  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • Dinoprostone / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture / therapy*
  • France
  • Humans
  • Labor, Induced / methods
  • Misoprostol / therapeutic use
  • Oxytocics / therapeutic use
  • Oxytocin / therapeutic use
  • Pregnancy
  • Streptococcal Infections / diagnosis
  • Streptococcus agalactiae
  • beta-Lactams / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Oxytocics
  • beta-Lactams
  • Misoprostol
  • Oxytocin
  • Dinoprostone