Collaboration and followership: A stochastic model for activities in social networks

PLoS One. 2019 Oct 30;14(10):e0223768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223768. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

In this work we investigate how future actions are influenced by the previous ones, in the specific contexts of scientific collaborations and friendships on social networks. We describe the activity of the agents, providing a model for the formation of the bipartite network of actions and their features. Therefore we only require to know the chronological order in which the actions are performed, and not the order in which the agents are observed. Moreover, the total number of possible features is not specified a priori but is allowed to increase along time, and new actions can independently show some new-entry features or exhibit some of the old ones. The choice of the old features is driven by a degree-fitness method: indeed, the probability that a new action shows one of the old features does not solely depend on the popularity of that feature (i.e. the number of previous actions showing it), but it is also affected by some individual traits of the agents or the features themselves, synthesized in certain quantities, called fitnesses or weights, that can have different forms and different meaning according to the specific setting considered. We show some theoretical properties of the model and provide statistical tools for the parameters' estimation. The model has been tested on three different datasets and the numerical results are provided and discussed.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Intersectoral Collaboration*
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Social Behavior*
  • Social Networking*
  • Stochastic Processes

Grants and funding

This work of FS was supported by the EU projects CoeGSS (Grant No. 676547), Openmaker (Grant No. 687941), SoBigData (Grant No. 654024). IC and FS acknowledge support from the Italian “Programma di Attività Integrata” (PAI), project “TOol for Fighting FakEs” (TOFFE) funded by IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.