Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced and Relapsed Pelvic Malignancies - An Analysis of 100 Cases

In Vivo. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):2205-2210. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11723.

Abstract

Background/aim: Although pelvic exenteration is an aggressive surgical procedure, it remains almost the only curative solution for patients diagnosed with large pelvic malignancies.

Patients and methods: We present a series of 100 patients submitted to pelvic exenteration with curative intent.

Results: The origin of the primary tumor was most commonly represented by cervical cancer, followed by, endometrial cancer, rectal cancer, ovarian cancer and vulvo-vaginal cancer. An R0 resection was confirmed in 68 cases, while the remaining 32 cases presented lateral positive resection margins or perineal positive margins. The postoperative morbidity rate was 37% while the mortality rate was 3%. As for the-long term outcomes, the median overall survival time was 38.7 months, being most significantly influenced by the origin of the primary tumor.

Conclusion: Although pelvic exenteration is still associated with an increased morbidity, an important improvement in the long-term survival can be achieved, especially if radical resection is feasible.

Keywords: Pelvic exenteration; curative; survival.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Disease Management
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pelvic Exenteration* / adverse effects
  • Pelvic Exenteration* / methods
  • Pelvic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Pelvic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Pelvic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Prognosis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tumor Burden