Objectives: Computed tomography (CT)-guided localization of multiple ipsilateral pulmonary nodules remains challenging. Hybrid operating rooms equipped with cone-beam CT and laser navigation systems have the potential for improving clinical workflows and patient outcomes.
Methods: Patients with multiple ipsilateral pulmonary nodules requiring localization were divided according to the localization method [preoperative CT-guided (POCT group) localization versus intraoperative CT-guided (IOCT group) localization]. The 2 groups were compared in terms of procedural efficacy, safety and radiation exposure.
Results: Patients in the IOCT (n = 12) and POCT (n = 42) groups did not differ in terms of demographic and tumour characteristics. Moreover, the success and complication rates were similar. Notably, the IOCT approach allowed multiple nodules to be almost simultaneously localized-resulting in a shorter procedural time [mean difference (MD) -15.83 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -7.97 to -23.69 min] and lower radiation exposure (MD -15.59 mSv, 95% CI -7.76 to -23.42 mSv) compared with the POCT approach. However, the total time under general anaesthesia was significantly longer in the IOCT group (MD 34.96 min, 95% CI 1.48-68.42 min), despite a similar operating time. The excess time under anaesthesia in the IOCT group can be attributed not only to the procedure per se but also to a longer surgical preparation time (MD 21.63 min, 95% CI 10.07-33.19 min).
Conclusions: Compared with the POCT approach, IOCT-guided localization performed in a hybrid operating room is associated with a shorter procedural time and less radiation exposure, albeit at the expense of an increased time under general anaesthesia.
Keywords: ARTIS zeego; Hybrid operating room; Localization; Pulmonary nodules.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.