A comparison study of three physical activity measurement tools examining acceptability in people with psychosis

Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(2):175-179. doi: 10.1177/1039856219881957. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the acceptability of three distinct physical activity measurement tools in people with psychosis: an objective measurement tool, a self-report measure, and an exercise capacity test.

Methods: We measured the completion rate for each measurement tool. Participants rated the ease/difficulty of each measure using a 7-point Likert scale. Participants were also asked to rank the three tools in order of the ease of use.

Results: Sixty-six per cent (46/69) of participants completed all three assessment tools, and 60.9% (42/69) completed the acceptability questionnaire. The majority of the participants found it easy to complete all three measurement tools. The majority (52.8%) of the participants ranked the objective measurement tool as the easiest to use.

Conclusion: All three measures were acceptable to people with psychosis, but objective measurement tools may be easier to use.

Keywords: acceptability; clinical measurement; physical activity; psychotic disorder.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Exercise Test / methods*
  • Exercise*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Psychotic Disorders / rehabilitation*
  • Self Report
  • Young Adult