Parthenogenesis and developmental constraints

Evol Dev. 2020 Jan;22(1-2):205-217. doi: 10.1111/ede.12324. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

Abstract

The absence of a paternal contribution in an unfertilized ovum presents two developmental constraints against the evolution of parthenogenesis. We discuss the constraint caused by the absence of a centrosome and the one caused by the missing set of chromosomes and how they have been broken in specific taxa. They are examples of only a few well-underpinned examples of developmental constraints acting at macro-evolutionary scales in animals. Breaking of the constraint of the missing chromosomes is the best understood and generally involves rare occasions of drastic changes of meiosis. These drastic changes can be best explained by having been induced, or at least facilitated, by sudden cytological events (e.g., repeated rounds of hybridization, endosymbiont infections, and contagious infections). Once the genetic and developmental machinery is in place for regular or obligate parthenogenesis, shifts to other types of parthenogenesis can apparently rather easily evolve, for example, from facultative to obligate parthenogenesis, or from pseudoarrhenotoky to haplodiploidy. We argue that the combination of the two developmental constraints forms a near-absolute barrier against the gradual evolution from sporadic to obligate or regular facultative parthenogenesis, which can probably explain why the occurrence of the highly advantageous mode of regular facultative parthenogenesis is so rare and entirely absent in vertebrates.

Keywords: aneuploidy; centrosome; endosymbiosis; evolutionary constraints; hybridization; meiosis; mitosis; pleiotropy; wolbachia.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Invertebrates / growth & development*
  • Parthenogenesis*
  • Vertebrates / growth & development*