When an academic culture based on self-enhancement values undermines female students' sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and academic choices

J Soc Psychol. 2020 May 3;160(3):373-389. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1675576. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

Abstract

Although overall women are better represented in higher education than men, women's psychological experience in various academic contexts is qualified by a decreased sense of belonging and academic self-efficacy, including in fields where they are not targeted by a negative stereotype. To clarify this phenomenon, we develop the hypothesis of a mismatch between female students' values and the values associated with success in the increasingly selective realm of higher education. We argue that, whatever the fields of study, these values are self-enhancement values (competitiveness, self-affirmation, dominance). Three studies showed that when success was depicted in terms of self-enhancement values, women - but not men - expressed a lower sense of belonging, had lower self-efficacy and were less likely to pursue a given academic opportunity both in STEM and non-STEM fields of study. These effects did not appear in an academic context depicting success as being rooted in self-transcendence values (helpfulness, cooperation, benevolence).

Keywords: Gendered values; academic choices; academic self-efficacy; higher education; sense of belonging.

MeSH terms

  • Achievement*
  • Adult
  • Career Choice*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Self Efficacy*
  • Social Values*
  • Students / psychology*
  • Universities
  • Women / psychology*
  • Young Adult