An application of PCR-RFLP species identification assay for environmental DNA detection

PeerJ. 2019 Oct 3:7:e7597. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7597. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Recent advancement of environmental DNA (eDNA) methods for surveying species in aquatic ecosystems has been used for various organisms and contributed to monitoring and conservation of species and environments. Amphibians are one of the promising taxa which could be monitored efficiently by applying quantitative PCR (qPCR) or next generation sequencing to eDNA. However, the cost of eDNA detection using these approaches can be quite high and requires instruments that are not usually installed in ecology laboratories. For aiding researchers in starting eDNA studies of amphibians, especially those not specialized in molecular biology, we developed a cost efficient protocol using PCR-RFLP method. We attempted to detect eDNA of three Japanese Rana species (Rana japonica, Rana ornativentris, and Rana tagoi tagoi) in various spatial scales including an area close to the Fukushima nuclear power plant where the environment is recovering after the disaster in 2011. Our PCR-RFLP protocol was successful in detecting Rana species in static water in both laboratory and field; however, it could not detect Rana species in non-static water samples from the field. Even a more sensitive detection method (standard qPCR) was unable to detect frogs in all non-static water samples. We speculate that our new protocol is effective for frogs living in lentic habitats, but not for lotic habitats which may still require the gold standard of field observation for detection approach.

Keywords: Amphibian; Distribution range; Environmental DNA; Frog species; Monitoring survey; Species identification; Tadpole; Water sample.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a Scientific Research Grant from the Kurita Water, Japan and Environment Foundation Grant, by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment (4RF-1302), and Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency (4-1503 and 4-1602), Japan, and the faculty of Life and Environmental Science in Shimane University, Japan provided financial support towards publishing this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.