Electronic medical record-based cohort selection and direct-to-patient, targeted recruitment: early efficacy and lessons learned

Hailey N Miller; Kelly T Gleason; Stephen P Juraschek; Timothy B Plante; Cassie Lewis-Land; Bonnie Woods; Lawrence J Appel; Daniel E Ford; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb

doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz168

Electronic medical record-based cohort selection and direct-to-patient, targeted recruitment: early efficacy and lessons learned

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1209-1217. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz168.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
² Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
³ Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
⁴ Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
⁵ Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Abstract

Objective: The study sought to characterize institution-wide participation in secure messaging (SM) at a large academic health network, describe our experience with electronic medical record (EMR)-based cohort selection, and discuss the potential roles of SM for research recruitment.

Materials and methods: Study teams defined eligibility criteria to create a computable phenotype, structured EMR data, to identify and recruit participants. Patients with SM accounts matching this phenotype received recruitment messages. We compared demographic characteristics across SM users and the overall health system. We also tabulated SM activation and use, characteristics of individual studies, and efficacy of the recruitment methods.

Results: Of the 1 308 820 patients in the health network, 40% had active SM accounts. SM users had a greater proportion of white and non-Hispanic patients than nonactive SM users id. Among the studies included (n = 13), 77% recruited participants with a specific disease or condition. All studies used demographic criteria for their phenotype, while 46% (n = 6) used demographic, disease, and healthcare utilization criteria. The average SM response rate was 2.9%, with higher rates among condition-specific (3.4%) vs general health (1.4%) studies. Those studies with a more inclusive comprehensive phenotype had a higher response rate.

Discussion: Target population and EMR queries (computable phenotypes) affect recruitment efficacy and should be considered when designing an EMR-based recruitment strategy.

Conclusions: SM guided by EMR-based cohort selection is a promising approach to identify and enroll research participants. Efforts to increase the number of active SM users and response rate should be implemented to enhance the effectiveness of this recruitment strategy.

Keywords: cohort selection; direct messaging; electronic medical records; patient portal messaging; research recruitment.

Publication types

Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

Academic Medical Centers
Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
Computer Security*
Data Mining / methods
Electronic Health Records*
Humans
Patient Portals*
Patient Selection*
Text Messaging*

Abstract

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding