Purpose: This study evaluates the effects of various pulsing paradigms, on the irreversible electroporation (IRE) lesion, induced electric current, and temperature changes using a perfused porcine liver model. Materials and methods: A 4-monopolar electrode array delivered IRE therapy varying the pulse length and inter-pulse delay to six porcine mechanically perfused livers. Pulse paradigms included six forms of cycled pulsing schemes and the conventional pulsing scheme. Finite element models provided further insight into the effects of cycled pulsing on the temperature and thermal injury distribution. Results: 'Single pulse cycle with no interpulse delay' deposited maximum average energy (2.34 ± 0.35 kJ) and produced the largest ratio of thermally damaged tissue area and IRE ablation area from all other pulse schemes (18.22% 8.11, p < .0001 all pairwise comparisons). These compared favorably to the conventional algorithm (2.09 ± 0.37 kJ, 3.49% 2.20, p < .0001, all comparisons). Though no statistical significance was found between groups, the '5 pulse cycle, 0 s delay' pulse paradigm produced the largest average IRE ablation cross sectional area (11.81 ± 1.97 cm2), while conventional paradigm yielded an average of 8.90 ± 0.91 cm2. Finite element modeling indicated a '10 pulse cycle, 10 s delay' generated the least thermal tissue damage and '1 pulse cycle, 0 s delay' pulse cycle sequence the most (0.47 vs. 3.76 cm2), over a lengthier treatment time (16.5 vs. 6.67 minutes). Conclusions: Subdividing IRE pulses and adding delays throughout the treatment can reduce white tissue coagulation and electric current, while maintaining IRE treatment sizes.
Keywords: Cycled pulsing; irreversible electroporation; perfused organ model; thermal damage; thermal mitigation.