Dermal absorption study OECD TG 428 mass balance recommendations based on the EFSA database

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Nov:108:104475. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104475. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance (EFSA, 2017) for dermal absorption (DA) studies recommends stringent mass balance (MB) limits of 95-105%. EFSA suggested that test material can be lost after penetration and requires that for chemicals with <5% absorption the non-recovered material must be added to the absorbed dose if MB is <95%. This has huge consequences for low absorption pesticides. Indeed, one third of the MBs in the EFSA DA database are outside the refined criteria. This is also true for DA data generated by Cosmetics Europe (Gregoire et al., 2019), indicating that this criterion is often not achieved even when using highly standardized protocols. While EFSA hypothesizes that modern analytical and pipetting techniques would enable to achieve this criterion, no scientific basis was provided. We describe how protocol procedures impact MB and evaluate the EFSA DA database to demonstrate that MB is subject to random variation. Generic application of "the addition rule" skews the measured data and increases the DA estimate, which results in unnecessary risk assessment failure. In conclusion, "missing material" is just a random negative deviation to the nominal dose. We propose a data-driven MB criterion of 90-110%, fully in line with OECD recommendations.

Keywords: Agrochemicals; Cosmetics; Dermal absorption; Exploratory data analysis; Human skin; Pesticides; Plant protection products; Risk assessment; in vitro.

MeSH terms

  • Databases, Factual
  • European Union
  • Food Safety
  • Humans
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
  • Skin Absorption*
  • Toxicity Tests / methods*