Criteria for dose-finding in two-stage seamless adaptive design

J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(5):908-919. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1657130. Epub 2019 Sep 7.

Abstract

In pharmaceutical/clinical development, two-stage seamless adaptive designs are commonly considered. Such designs include a two-stage phase I/II or phase II/III adaptive trial that combines one phase IIb study for dose-finding or treatment selection and one phase III study for efficacy confirmation into a single study. At the end of stage 1, promising dose(s) will be selected based on pre-specified selection criteria. In practice, since there is little power with limited subjects available at interim, commonly considered selection criteria for critical decision-making include (i) conditional power, (ii) precision analysis, (iii) predictive probability of success, and (iv) probability of being the best dose or treatment. The selected promising dose(s) will then proceed to the next stage for efficacy confirmation. In this article, we introduce, compare, and evaluate these criteria. Simulation studies and a numeric example are given to illustrate those criteria. Besides, we attempt to address some concerns for the two-stage seamless adaptive clinical trial.

Keywords: Dose selection; efficacy; interim analysis; probability of being the best dose; seamless adaptive design.

MeSH terms

  • Cardiovascular Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Coronary Vasospasm / drug therapy
  • Coronary Vasospasm / physiopathology
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Endpoint Determination / methods
  • Endpoint Determination / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic / methods
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Probability*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data*

Substances

  • Cardiovascular Agents