Assessing Implementation Strategy Reporting in the Mental Health Literature: A Narrative Review

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Jan;47(1):19-35. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00965-8.

Abstract

Inadequate implementation strategy reporting restricts research synthesis and replicability. We explored the implementation strategy reporting quality of a sample of mental health articles using Proctor et al.'s (Implement Sci 8:139, 2013) reporting recommendations. We conducted a narrative review to generate the sample of articles and assigned a reporting quality score to each article. The mean article reporting score was 54% (range 17-100%). The most reported domains were: name (100%), action (82%), target (80%), and actor (67%). The least reported domains included definition (6%), temporality (26%), justification (34%), and outcome (37%). We discuss limitations and provide recommendations to improve reporting.

Keywords: Implementation strategies; Mental health; Reporting.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Evidence-Based Practice / organization & administration*
  • Health Plan Implementation / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Implementation Science
  • Mental Health*
  • Research / organization & administration*