PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Dec;46(13):2780-2789. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04468-4. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

Purpose: Image quality of positron emission tomography (PET) is limited by various physical degradation factors. Our study aims to perform PET image denoising by utilizing prior information from the same patient. The proposed method is based on unsupervised deep learning, where no training pairs are needed.

Methods: In this method, the prior high-quality image from the patient was employed as the network input and the noisy PET image itself was treated as the training label. Constrained by the network structure and the prior image input, the network was trained to learn the intrinsic structure information from the noisy image and output a restored PET image. To validate the performance of the proposed method, a computer simulation study based on the BrainWeb phantom was first performed. A 68Ga-PRGD2 PET/CT dataset containing 10 patients and a 18F-FDG PET/MR dataset containing 30 patients were later on used for clinical data evaluation. The Gaussian, non-local mean (NLM) using CT/MR image as priors, BM4D, and Deep Decoder methods were included as reference methods. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) improvements were used to rank different methods based on Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: For the simulation study, contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) vs. standard deviation (STD) curves showed that the proposed method achieved the best performance regarding the bias-variance tradeoff. For the clinical PET/CT dataset, the proposed method achieved the highest CNR improvement ratio (53.35% ± 21.78%), compared with the Gaussian (12.64% ± 6.15%, P = 0.002), NLM guided by CT (24.35% ± 16.30%, P = 0.002), BM4D (38.31% ± 20.26%, P = 0.002), and Deep Decoder (41.67% ± 22.28%, P = 0.002) methods. For the clinical PET/MR dataset, the CNR improvement ratio of the proposed method achieved 46.80% ± 25.23%, higher than the Gaussian (18.16% ± 10.02%, P < 0.0001), NLM guided by MR (25.36% ± 19.48%, P < 0.0001), BM4D (37.02% ± 21.38%, P < 0.0001), and Deep Decoder (30.03% ± 20.64%, P < 0.0001) methods. Restored images for all the datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively smooth out the noise while recovering image details.

Conclusion: The proposed unsupervised deep learning framework provides excellent image restoration effects, outperforming the Gaussian, NLM methods, BM4D, and Deep Decoder methods.

Keywords: Anatomical prior; Deep neural network; Denoising; Position emission tomography; Unsupervised deep learning.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Deep Learning*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Positron-Emission Tomography*
  • Quality Control
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio*
  • Unsupervised Machine Learning*