Assessing the gut mucosa milieu is important to grade the inflammatory process in conditions such as food hypersensitivity, allergy, gut parasitosis, etc. However, the gastrointestinal tract comprises a challenging system to evaluate, due to its thin tubular structure and mucosa, which suffer fast autolysis after death. Irrespective of the preferred inflammatory score system, it is important to choose the technique that will render the best tissue analysis. Thus, our aim was to compare two of the most frequently used methods to collect, process and analyze gut segments, the Swiss Roll and the Intestinal Strips. Normal C57Bl/6 mice were randomly assigned to Rolls or Strips group. After an overdose of anesthetics, segments of the duodenum, jejunum and ileum were collected and prepared accordingly for histological processing and analysis. Our results show the villi in the Rolls tend to be shorter and wider than those in the Strips in the duodenum and jejunum but not the ileum. No significant differences were observed in intra-epithelial lymphocytes and goblet cells counts. Finally, we staged each segment using our histomorphometric classification system, which revealed that although all animals presented a normal intestinal mucosa, those assigned to the Rolls group had their mucosa staged in the Infiltrative Stage while the Strips group had their mucosa staged as Normal. In conclusion, Swiss Rolls might be desirable for a wider assessment of the intestine, as it allows large segments to be analyzed at once, while Strips are better suited when detailed evaluation of each villus is intended.
Keywords: Gut; Intestine; Intestine strips; Pathological technique; Swiss roll.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.