Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open-healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Nov;46(11):1144-1154. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13184. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the effect of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in molar sites without primary flap closure.

Materials and methods: Three groups were established: extraction sockets grafted with deproteinized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM-C) and covered by a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group 1), sockets grafted with DBBM-C only (test group 2), and sockets that healed naturally (control group). Primary flap closure was not attempted. Conebeam computed tomography scans were obtained immediately and then 4 months after ARP. A biopsy was performed. The change of the marginal bone level was measured.

Results: There was significantly less horizontal resorption in test group 1 than in the control group at levels 1 mm (-1.02 ± 0.88 [mean ± SD] vs. -4.44 ± 3.71 mm) and 3 mm (-0.31 ± 1.51 vs. -2.27 ± 1.15 mm) below the crest, and significantly less vertical reduction in the midcrestal area in test group 1 than in test group 2 (-0.25 ± 0.95 vs. -1.15 ± 1.63 mm) (p < .05). There were no significant differences between test groups in clinical and histomorphometric measurements. All groups exhibited stable marginal bone levels after 1 year of loading.

Conclusion: Alveolar ridge preservation without primary flap closure in molar areas was effective in minimizing ridge resorption and facilitated implant treatment.

Keywords: bone regeneration; bone substitute; randomized controlled trial; tooth extraction; wound healing.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alveolar Bone Loss*
  • Alveolar Ridge Augmentation*
  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Humans
  • Molar
  • Tooth Extraction
  • Tooth Socket